It is normal to say that each party has its own intellectual property and that nothing is transferred under the NDA. But if you go beyond that to assign existing intellectual property or to prescribe common ownership of newly created PIs, etc., you are talking about a broader form of agreement. For example, a test agreement, a service agreement, or a broader commercial or research and development partnership. It can still be difficult to turn the other side around to use your organization`s presentation (although it is tempted by all means), so a good solution may be to provide a neutral model for third parties. For example, a standard secrecy agreement issued by a law firm, the NDA from a traditional document automation provider or a service such as Haggle. With an NDA, each party retains ownership of the intellectual property and the rights of its own confidential information. This type of agreement does not provide for any license or other rights over the other party`s confidential information. Unauthorized disclosure or use by agents. Where the party disclosing losses or responsibilities resulting from the disclosure or use of confidential information by one or more representatives of the recipient who are not authorized in this agreement, that disclosure or use is considered by the recipient to be established to determine whether the recipient has breached any of its obligations under this agreement. These mechanisms are unusual and not suitable in an NDA. There is no framework for specifying the details of an infringement or justifying in advance the actual losses that would be in such a simple short form agreement without a related transaction (it usually depends on what exactly is revealed and who, etc.). Even in larger and more complex agreements, liquidated damages rarely apply to breaches of confidentiality.
It is particularly problematic to try to do so in a short period of time. Companies around the world spend a lot of time and therefore money reaching out to privacy or NDAs with their many potential customers or suppliers before they can even start discussing buying or selling their products or services. When I recently looked at another NOA, I felt that there should be a simpler and more effective way to address the issue of defining the principle of confidentiality of communications made in routine product and service negotiations.